Virginia Business
Spacer
SEARCH
Spacer
NEWS CENTER
Spacer

August 2007

Home page
Current Issue
Past issues
Daily Headlines
Virginia Ideas
Editor's Blog
Spacer
TOP FEATURES
Spacer
Business Calendar
Virginia's Wealthiest
List of Leaders
Fantastic 50
Legal Elite
Super CPAs
Maritime Guide
Business Guide
Spacer
MARKET RESEARCH
Spacer
Business Libraries
Regional Guides
Spacer
CLASSIFIEDS
Spacer
Jobs
VACommercial
Executive Services
Spacer
CONTACT US
Spacer
Contact Us
Advertise With us
Planning Calendar
Subscribe
Spacer

Return to Virginia Business - December 2003

Cover story

THE 2003 LEGAL ELITE
Big firms are getting bigger — can ‘Law-Mart’ be far behind?

Related links:
- Bankruptcy/Creditors' Rights: Frank J. Santoro

- Business Law: Allen C. Goolsby III
- Civil Litigation: James C. Roberts
- Criminal Law: Anthony F. Anderson
- Environmental Law: Paul R. Thomson Jr.
- Family/Domestic Relations: Andrea R. Stiles
- Health Law: Patrick C. Devine Jr.
- Intellectual Property: James R. Creekmore
- Labor/Employment: Harris D. Butler III
- Legislative/Regulatory: Anthony F. Troy
- Real Estate/Construction: Joseph W. Richmond Jr.
- Taxes/Estates/Trusts: Timothy H. Guare

by Robert Burke
Virginia Business

December, 2003

The legal profession has always been a bird dog of sorts for business trends. Find a region or a particular sector that is heating up and it’s likely that lawyers will soon gather nearby. In recent years, that hunt for new territory has been dominated by the expanding reach of large firms that seem bent on becoming even larger. If a firm is not big enough to cover an emerging or underserved market, or lacks a presence in a major urban market, a merger or acquisition often follows, which naturally gives these new, larger firms an advantage in seizing profitable new turf. In recent years they’ve been more aggressive than ever.

According to the consulting firm Hillenbrandt International, the number of law firm mergers peaked in 2001 with 82. The figure dropped to 53 last year and so far in 2003 there have been only 30 mergers, but the effect is being felt. The big firms can go to major clients and offer a host of services and locations in major urban markets.

Pittsburgh-based Reed Smith, for example, has about 100 lawyers in three offices in Virginia. The firm’s most profitable location in Virginia is its Leesburg office, where its land-use attorneys are caught up in a heated legal fight over growth. Reed Smith attorneys are involved in the 200 or so lawsuits filed against the county over land-use restrictions put in place by county supervisors, says James P. Gallatin Jr., managing partner for the firm’s Virginia locations. After passing the restrictions a few years ago the county set aside $1 million to defend the expected legal challenges. They might as well have waved a red flag at attorneys, says Gallatin.

Reed Smith’s foothold in Loudoun County came out of its 1999 acquisition of the 85-lawyer firm of Hazel & Thomas, which had an established land-use law practice. In recent years, mergers and acquisitions have pushed Reed Smith to 1,000 lawyers and expanded its reach across the U.S. and into new practice areas. In March it acquired the immigration practice of Richmond-based firm McCandlish Holton. “I think it’s the full-service firms like ours that are doing fine,” Gallatin says.

Richmond-based McGuireWoods LLP has also recently completed a major merger and expansion. In October it established a health care department with 22 lawyers focused solely on that industry. The move was triggered in part by the July merger with Chicago-based Ross & Hardies, which has had its own health law department for more than 20 years. The combined firm has 725 lawyers.

McGuireWoods Chairman Robert L. Burrus Jr. says firms are increasingly moving away from selecting new locations based on the needs of a particular client. “I think the movement toward consolidation has become much broader than that. I think firms will open where they feel it would be good for their practice to be and where there’s a culturally strategically good fit without first finding a client that wants them to be there.”

With an eye toward cutting costs, more companies are choosing to outsource their legal work, and they’re reducing the number of law firms they hire, Burrus says. That is putting an even greater squeeze on mid-sized firms, says Virginia Bar Association Executive Vice President Breck Arrington. “I think life is getting tough” for smaller firms, he says. Those firms can still provide their knowledge of ever-changing state laws, but sometimes struggle to offset the effect of consolidation. It’s similar to Wal-Mart’s impact on small local retailers. “Maybe it’ll be ‘Law-Mart,’” he says.

Excellence in the legal profession, however, can be found at firms of any size. For the fourth year, Virginia Business has tried to identify the best lawyers in the commonwealth. With help from The Virginia Bar Association we polled more than 5,500 lawyers, asking them to nominate lawyers in their own firms and outside in 12 categories of law. On the following pages are short profiles of the 12 top vote getters in each category, along with an alphabetical list of others cited by colleagues for their outstanding work.

Return to Virginia Business - December 2003


Virginia Business Online | Contact Us | E-mail the editor

VirginiaBusiness.com is part of the GatewayVa network.

©2007, Media General Operations Inc., publisher of Virginia Business.
Use of this website is subject to certain terms and conditions.