|
Insights
on Excellence | "Insights
on Excellence" Archive
The case of the missing tools
ABOUT
THE AUTHOR
|
Stephen
Hawley Martin is
a former principal of The Martin Agency
in Richmond and the author of more than
half a dozen books including his newest,
Lean Enterprise Leader: How to Get Things
Done Without Doing It All Yourself.
He is editor and
publisher of The
Oaklea Press, a book publishing business
dedicated primarily to helping business
executives increase productivity.
He can be reached at shmartin@oakleapress.com
|
|
|
|
by Stephen
Hawley Martin
for Virginia Business
Nov. 16, 2006
Managers of a manufacturing business
in Kentucky suspected tools were "clocking out" -
leaving the premises and walking off with third-shift
workers. People who
wanted to take a tool with them could go out a rear side
door where lighting was poor and no security guard was
posted at that time of day. Few workers used the door
because it was some distance from the parking lot. Locking
the door wasn't an option because it had to be accessible
for emergency and fire evacuation.
The solution to this turned out to be fairly simple.
What was the last thing workers did before they left?
They had to clock out. Restricting third-shift employees
from using the clock by that door could be accomplished
by deactivating it after the second shift. The company
had an up-to-date time and attendance system, so doing
so was as easy as the click of a mouse. This way, everyone
would be forced to use the exit in a high traffic area
where workers could be observed leaving the premises.
Further, the system could report anyone who even attempted
to use the rear door during third shift.
Making a change in time clock configuration was certainly
cheaper than adding a security guard, or the cost of
stolen equipment.
Tools that sprout legs and walk
off aren't the only way a company can get ripped off
by employees, or the
only thing an up-to-date time and attendance system can
fix as noted in the new Oaklea Press release due out
in January called "Working the Clock." Another
culprit is "The Buddy System."
The buddy system is when Bob
says to his co-worker, Charley, "Hey buddy, punch me out when you leave
today. I'm going home early." If it's important
to know it was actually Bob who punched out at 5 p.m.,
then make certain the technology has some sort of user
identification validation. Phone systems can enforce
voice identification or caller ID. Also, ANI (Automated
Number Identification) is provided today on most telephone
lines. Telephony systems can compare the incoming phone
number against a list of authorized phone numbers - restricting
callers from attempting to call from an unidentified
or invalid phone number. In addition, biometrics technology
allows customers to verify an employee's identity via
fingerprint scanners,
Here are some basic security
issues to think about. If employees must enter an ID
number on a key pad in
a common, unsecured area and the keypad is visible to
passers-by, the question needs to be addressed, should
that ID number be kept confidential? It's not uncommon
for employers to assign employees' Social Security numbers
as their login ID numbers. Punching that number into
a keypad for anyone to see could be risky. Asking the
vendor if the display can show only an asterisk (*) instead
of the actual numbers may be all the security that is
needed. For phone users, using the same numbering convention
might allow the next caller to hit the "repeat" button
and view the last employee's ID, which might be a Social
Security number.
PINs are also a concern. These numbers are only as secure
as employees want them to be. Relying on employees to
keep their PIN numbers private and using them to verify
their identity is potentially fraught with trouble. Again,
the buddy system can come into play when Bob shares his
PIN number with a co-worker to punch in for him. Also,
PIN numbers are often forgotten and require continual
re-assignment. That assignment process opens yet another
opportunity for abuse when system administrators change
an employee's security settings and must use some other
means of verifying the employee's identity. Any number
that identifies an employee in the system must be guarded.
Screen views, reports, displays and playbacks are windows
of opportunity for unauthorized users to gain access
to employee records.
If you are considering upgrading your time and attendance
system, ask prospective vendors to explain how they view
the security issue and make certain the importance of
guarding data is clearly understood.
-----------------------------------------------------
Stephen Hawley Martin is a former principal of The Martin Agency in Richmond
and the author of more than half a dozen books including his newest, Lean Enterprise
Leader: How to Get Things Done Without Doing It All Yourself. He is editor and
publisher of The Oaklea Press, a book publishing business dedicated primarily
to helping business executives increase productivity.
|