|
Insights
on Excellence | "Insights
on Excellence" Archive
Is it a cost or an investment?
ABOUT
THE AUTHOR
|
Stephen
Hawley Martin is
a former principal of The Martin Agency
in Richmond and the author of more than
half a dozen books including his newest,
Lean Enterprise Leader: How to Get Things
Done Without Doing It All Yourself.
He is editor and
publisher of The
Oaklea Press, a book publishing business
dedicated primarily to helping business
executives increase productivity.
He can be reached at shmartin@oakleapress.com
|
|
|
|
by Stephen
Hawley Martin
for Virginia Business
March 7, 2006
Business executives hear proposals almost daily on terrific
ways to spend the company's money. But the question for
people controlling the purse strings must always be:
Is it a cost or an investment?
The key to effective cost control is determining if
the money spent would be a cost (for something that
would be nice to have) or an investment (for something
with an expected return that is critical to success
to business). In a turnaround situation, or in a very
competitive market, it is crucial that costs be cut
to the bone. No "nice to have" spending can
be allowed. ROI (Return on investment) must rule the
day or your competitors will pass you by.
For example, does entertaining ourselves create a return
on investment? Of course not. How about limousines
and private jets? Or flying first class? Or, for example,
you might ask why the company uses a bunch of different
marketing companies? How does that approach help the
company sell more products? Just because a marketing
executive likes a particular ad firm does not justify
having to duplicate efforts and pay twice for the same
service. By consolidating, you might be able to get
better deals.
William T. Monahan gives an example
in his book "Billion
Dollar Turnaround: The 3M Spinoff that Became Imation" about
a "nice to have" company perk. When he took
over the Austin, Texas, group for 3M, it had corporate
jet service between St. Paul, Minn., and Austin three
times a week. The jets provided a convenient way to
get to meetings at 3M headquarters in St. Paul and
saved time for the 12 people on the plane each day.
But the jet service was a luxury Monahan felt the company
could not afford if it was to turn around the Austin
operation. The jets also encouraged people to take
unnecessary trips to the headquarters. The challenges
the group faced were not in St. Paul. They were at
the Texas location, around the country, and around
the world.
Monahan says scuttling the shuttle was one of the most
unpopular decisions he ever made but also one of the
easiest. In the very next quarter after the decision,
trips to St. Paul went down by 40 percent. So not only
were costs reduced, but productivity was increased.
Monahan became known as "the Grinch who stole
the shuttle," but it was the right thing to do.
While we are on the subject, let's talk about corporate
jets. They are an executive perk that insulates executives
from the real world. It seems to me that executives
need to travel with their salespeople, to see the market
firsthand and to stay in touch with reality. Private
aircraft and limos set executives apart and reduce
effectiveness and hands-on time. They remove executives
from their team and place them far from their customers,
their field people, and an understanding of their needs.
Your constituencies don't always have to agree with
the rationale or like the actions you take. That's
goes with the territory of being the boss. Monahan
writes about an announced a change in medical coverage,
for example. His HR people took the medical programs
of the 10 top companies in Minnesota, including 3M,
Medtronic and others, and pegged his company's program
right in the middle at No. 5. The problem was 3M had
a generous positive program that was far ahead of the
No. 2 plan. Employees saw there was a significant gap
in the medical program that the company had offered
as part of 3M and the new program it provided as an
independent company, Imation. Employees didn't care
if the Imation medical program was better than Medtronic,
Honeywell or whomever.
If people are strongly opposed to what a company is
doing, they leave (if they are employees) or sell the
stock (if they are investors). However, they at least
have the information they need to make this decision.
Experience shows that if you really tell people the "why" behind
a particular decision, these stakeholders tend to give
the new strategy a chance and usually end up buying
into the idea. But if you dictate to people and don't
explain, you end up in a painful situation. You often
suffer a loss of credibility and may wind up with a
large number of uncertain and indecisive employees
whose productivity is going to plummet. You need to ask, "Is it an expense or is it an
investment?" And you also need to be open and honest
with your information and rationale for decisions. Then
let the chips fall where they may. This approach is the
simplest and most effective way to get the organization
moving in a positive direction.
-----------------------------------------------------
Stephen Hawley Martin is a former principal of The Martin Agency in Richmond
and the author of more than half a dozen books including his newest, Lean Enterprise
Leader: How to Get Things Done Without Doing It All Yourself. He is editor and
publisher of The Oaklea Press, a book publishing business dedicated primarily
to helping business executives increase productivity.
|